Since the Occupy DC protests took root in McPherson Square at the beginning of October, over a hundred tents have been erected, as well as more permanent set-ups to service the everyday needs of the occupiers such as food, basic medical care, clothing, and reading material. As the occupation approaches its second month, participants must work to ensure the longevity of the movement while facing two big challenges: the fast-approaching winter and ideological issues that threaten the unity of the movement.
A big hurdle for the occupiers will be staying on through the winter. Although milder than those in Boston or New York, D.C. does experience cold winters. Last winter, the average temperature was 38 degrees Fahrenheit. To combat the elements, McPherson Square will require sturdier, warmer shelters. But with adequate preparation, the occupation can and should stay on through the winter months. Leaving would undermine the movement’s credibility and impact and allow politicians to divert national discourse away from the movement’s issues.
One of the more striking aspects of the movement is the sheer commitment of the occupiers. Their dedication to such a prolonged public display of discontent is a testament to the pervasiveness of the problems they are protesting. This movement has drawn a diverse group of protesters with many different priorities. But socioeconomic inequality and disproportionate corporate power underscore most of the specific issues, like student debt and environmentalism.
To prevent the movement from splintering, protesters should steer clear of identity issues and maintain their focus on socioeconomic inequality. While recognizing that prejudice, whether it is motivated by sex, race, or religion, plays a significant role in inequality in this country, Occupy DC should focus its energy on reforming a corrupt and corporatist political system.
As the movement continues to gain political prominence, it should strive to maintain a unified front in the face of opposition. Socioeconomic issues provide the most fundamental, unifying platform. This is not to say Occupy DC shouldn’t strive to be inclusive and accepting of all the occupiers’ personal causes. It should not tolerate racism or sexism from within the movement, but neither should it incorporate these issues as prominent facets of its platform.
To have the strongest impact, the Occupy movement, including Occupy DC, should strive for longevity and unity. Presenting a unified, committed front will augment the movement’s relevance in American politics. Failing to do so will simply maintain the power of the very few over the many.
